HABL: Artifacts in Action

Hybrid Artifact-Based Learning (HABL) is a practical instructional framework that combines physical texts, handwritten artifacts, digital artifacts, and technology-enhanced learning to improve student retention and engagement. This video explores the research behind HABL, explains its five-phase learning cycle, distinguishes it from TPACK, and demonstrates how it can be implemented across subjects including English, Mathematics, Business, Communications, Fine Arts, and Career and Technical Education. Rather than choosing between paper and screens, HABL shows how both can work together to create more meaningful and lasting learning experiences.

Important Links:

Publication Outline- https://www.theinstitution.info/habl-fr/assignment-1-publication-outline

Publication Rough Draft- https://www.theinstitution.info/habl-fr/o46vjte7b7h4yz19ge8yktm5w6wyxy

Publication Final Draft- https://www.theinstitution.info/habl-fr/final-article

References

Brunsman, B., & McEntarffer, R. (2023, February 23). Memorable feedback: Lessons from cognitive psychology in encoding. The Learning Scientists. https://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2023/2/23-1

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684.

Craik, F. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? Memory, 10(5–6), 305–318.

Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the bold (and the italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118, 111–115

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. Cambridge University Press.

Hughes, J. E., & Roblyer, M. D. (2022). Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching: Transforming Learning Across Disciplines. Pearson.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. In M. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), ICT integrated teacher education models (pp. 1–8). Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia (CEMCA).

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). Routledge.

Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581

Richland, L. E., Bjork, R. A., Finley, J. R., & Linn, M. C. (2005). Linking cognitive science to education: Generation and interleaving effects. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.1850–1855). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Tezer, M. (2024). Cognition and metacognition in education. In M. Tezer (Ed.), Metacognition in learning: New perspectives (Chap. 1). IntechOpen.https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.114857